A systematic review of screw- versus cement-retained implant-supported fixed restorations.

نویسندگان

  • Sami Sherif
  • Harlyn K Susarla
  • Theodoros Kapos
  • Deborah Munoz
  • Brian M Chang
  • Robert F Wright
چکیده

PURPOSE To systematically evaluate the survival and success of screw- versus cement-retained implant crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors performed an electronic search of nine databases using identical MeSH phrases. Systematic evaluation and data extraction of the articles from 1966 through 2007 were completed by three reviewers and two clinical academicians. The major outcome variable was implant or crown loss, and the minor outcome variables were screw loosening, decementation, and porcelain fracture. Random effects Poisson models were used to analyze the failure and complication rates. RESULTS The initial search produced 26,582 articles. Of these, 577 titles and subsequently 295 abstracts were available for evaluation, with 81 full texts meeting the criteria for review. Data were extracted from 23 level one and two research studies. Fleiss' kappa interevaluator agreement ranged from almost perfect to moderate. Major failures included 0.71 screw-retained and 0.87 cement-retained failures per 100 years. Minor failures included 3.66 screw loosenings, 2.54 decementations, and 0.46 porcelain fractures per 100 years. CONCLUSION There is no significant difference between cement- and screw-retained restorations for major and minor outcomes with regard to implant survival or crown loss. This is important data, as clinicians use both methods of restoration, and neither is a form of inferior care.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An alternative direct technique for the fabrication of an implant-supported, screw-retained fixed interim restoration.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Yilmaz et al Lautensack et al 7. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28. 8. Okamoto M, Minagi S. Technique for removing a cemented superstructure from an implant abutment. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:241-2. 9. Chee WW, Torbati A, Albouy JP....

متن کامل

Peri-implant bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess and compare peri-implant marginal bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic database and manual searches were undertaken to identify trials, prospective or retrospective studies reporting on radiographic marginal bone loss around dental implants restored with cement- and/or screw-re...

متن کامل

Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.

PURPOSE The present study was designed to compare the long-term outcome and complications of cemented versus screw-retained implant restorations in partially edentulous patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with bilateral partial posterior edentulism comprised the study group. Implants were placed, and cemented or screw-retained restorations were randomly assigned to the patien...

متن کامل

Survey of Screw-Retained versus Cement-Retained Implant Restorations in Saudi Arabia

Introduction Implant-supported prostheses are currently the standard treatment for the replacement of missing teeth and deficiencies. Implant restorations can either be screw-retained, cement-retained, or both. The implant retention system type is typically chosen during the treatment plan. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of implant restoration retention system...

متن کامل

Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.

A fixed dental prosthesis can be secured to an endosseous implant via cementation (using a provisional or definitive cement) on an implant abutment that is screw retained to the implant or directly in the implant via screw retention. The clinical decision as to which retention system best suits the individual patient depends on several factors. The aim of this review is to present a detailed ov...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists

دوره 23 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014